Hey Bowbroom, thanks for staying with us.Bowbroom wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2025 1:51 pm Some on here do want to see the demise of the RPRA as they have a deep seated hatred, just reread this thread and you will discover who.
All that is immaterial though, the voting on the 28th will determine how the association is run in the immediate future either by a continuation of Council or by an executive of 5 people. Either way the RPRA will carry on.
To pick up on your point about accountability, however tortuous it appears to some, under the current system there is a way for members to make their thoughts and feelings known, I’m uncertain how it will work If the management is vested in an executive committee, still we will find out if it happens I guess.
By the way I’m not a Councillor.
ATB
You admit that accountability is somewhat tortuous. For somone who uses their words carefully, I would say that is quite a strong description of the system
Following my own recent experience which you yourself recommended to me I would certainly go along with that and add a few more adjectives such as arduous and laborious and the important one which I dont have a word for is "open to persuasion by others"
So by your reckoning, if there is a continuation of council nothing will change.
So, if you are not a current councillor, can I assume that you have been, which I don't have any problem with anyway providing you were not involved with chucking out the Hall report because the councillors conducting that decision were not just ",open to persuasion" they were positively corrupt.
I wonder if you would consider that to be a way forward?