RPRA Rule Changes
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:34 pm
- Gender:
Morning Andy, so an update from Ian today, he will be doing a YouTube video next week at some point to discuss this. Hopefully with further meetings in the regions to vote on the proposals & then mandate their councillors to vote accordingly at the AGM .Last throw of the dice in my mind to change & stop this stagnation .
Last edited by CHARLTON34 on Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:34 pm
- Gender:
Update from Ian Evans tonight, on Wednesday evening there will be a question & answer on YouTube for people to ask questions about the RPRA proposal's, I also think Dan Soanes Brown will be on it as well,so if you have questions you'd like to put to him you can at [email protected] for Wednesday.
Regards Dave.
Regards Dave.
Thanks for that info Dave.CHARLTON34 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:30 pm Update from Ian Evans tonight, on Wednesday evening there will be a question & answer on YouTube for people to ask questions about the RPRA proposal's, I also think Dan Soanes Brown will be on it as well,so if you have questions you'd like to put to him you can at [email protected] for Wednesday.
Regards Dave.
Back just enjoying club racing for the time being.
Doesn’t look like he does. I do understand some of the things he is saying.
I can’t see many clubs having meetings to discuss all these changes and voting on them before the regions have meetings to see how they are mandated to vote at the AGM. I think it will just end up with the different regions voting on how they want rather than the members.
Back just enjoying club racing for the time being.
This CEO has his head in the sand. He began his article with the heading evolution, not revolution . How has it changed in the last 50 years? He clearly doesn't want change. He says democratic process is at the very core of the RPRA constitution? But it is so structured, change from grass roots is almost impossible. He says The RPRA is now on a sound financial footing? It is at present till they have to increase subs again from even fewer members to maintain the status quo.
With keeping ALL the regions the RPRA will end up with more chiefs than Indians. And the Indians will cover the running costs.
My suggestion start a NEW Union from scratch with fewer rules.
With keeping ALL the regions the RPRA will end up with more chiefs than Indians. And the Indians will cover the running costs.
My suggestion start a NEW Union from scratch with fewer rules.
I Wondered when the new union idea would surface again, my suggestion is as it always has been, if that’s what you want then get on with doing it give people a “choice” or as usual, will others be expected to do it for you? I suspect it will end up the same way as all the other times it’s been suggested with a big fat nothing as the proposers are never prepared to put the work in to achieve what they espouse.
Organisations necessarily evolve over time, to say that nothing has changed over 50 years is clearly wrong, some people detest the RPRA for whatever reason and nothing that the association does will ever suit them, the answer of course as this forum member has done is to resign and have nothing to do with the union ever again except to criticise when the opportunity arises.
Personally I think that the resistance to the propositions will occur because they will be considered to be too far too quickly.
We will know following the AGM.
Organisations necessarily evolve over time, to say that nothing has changed over 50 years is clearly wrong, some people detest the RPRA for whatever reason and nothing that the association does will ever suit them, the answer of course as this forum member has done is to resign and have nothing to do with the union ever again except to criticise when the opportunity arises.
Personally I think that the resistance to the propositions will occur because they will be considered to be too far too quickly.
We will know following the AGM.
Correct. The current team running the RPRA have turned things around brilliantly in the last 12 or so months. It is in a much better place than it was. And the CEO states that in time he knows smaller regions WILL have to merge. I can understand why people have put the propositions in but theres an old saying..all that glitters isn't gold. If they think big savings are gonna come off the back of it I think they could be in for a shock.Bowbroom wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:25 pm I Wondered when the new union idea would surface again, my suggestion is as it always has been, if that’s what you want then get on with doing it give people a “choice” or as usual, will others be expected to do it for you? I suspect it will end up the same way as all the other times it’s been suggested with a big fat nothing as the proposers are never prepared to put the work in to achieve what they espouse.
Organisations necessarily evolve over time, to say that nothing has changed over 50 years is clearly wrong, some people detest the RPRA for whatever reason and nothing that the association does will ever suit them, the answer of course as this forum member has done is to resign and have nothing to do with the union ever again except to criticise when the opportunity arises.
Personally I think that the resistance to the propositions will occur because they will be considered to be too far too quickly.
We will know following the AGM.