I think this ia a topic that will have mixed views, so what are members thoughts. When they are putting up a photo of their birds, is it a natural photo or do you like photos enanced? I have been working on some photos on gloss print photo paper, I must say I do like the outcome.
I've always been a bit half-soaked with photo's of my birds really
The only ones I had done (as a rule) were pigeons that had "won" something significant and were awarded the photograph as a consequence of the result.
Having said that there were plenty that I never bothered having done - "Champion Eddy" for instance. He never had his image done. I knew he wouldn't appreciate it so his wishes came before mine.
When I was in the sport before it was a badge of honour to have a picture on your wall of a fed topper by a chap called Anthony Bolton I seem to remember. I don’t suppose he’s still doing it?
PeteDerby wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:19 pm
When I was in the sport before it was a badge of honour to have a picture on your wall of a fed topper by a chap called Anthony Bolton I seem to remember. I don’t suppose he’s still doing it?
Anthony Bolton photos were excellent in b&w but not that good in colour. He used to touch up them up. Louella used him a lot. His colour photos were false colours. I recall being at Louella many years ago at saw the picture of 'Shy Lass' in the photo it had a green ring. But the bird was bred in 1975 and should have had a BLUE ring. To this day when I see a colour photo of a bird I always use the ring colour as a reference point. If the ring is the right colour, the bird will be.